data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d42db/d42db1c5a0a64e60fc1b54d673dcee38e6571bdb" alt=""
ASCCP Risk Based Consensus Guidelines for Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results
Ritu Nayar, MD | |
![]() | Teresa M. Darragh, MD Professor of Clinical Pathology UCSF Mt. Zion Medical Center San Francisco, California |
The 2020 Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines have several important differences from the 2012 Guidelines, while retaining many of its principles, such as the principle of equal management for equal risk. Rather than consider test results in isolation, the new guidelines use current and past results to create individualized assessments of a patient’s risk of progressing to precancer or cancer. The body of research informing these guidelines demonstrated differences in risk of pre-cancer based on prior screening history, and specific screening results. Using this research, the guidelines Working Groups developed risk assessments to allow clinicians to better triage those likely to develop pre-cancer in the next five years. The risk assessments and resulting Clinical Action Thresholds recommend which patients require expedited treatment, further workup, or surveillance, as well as those who may return safely to routine screening. The goals of the ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines are to increase accuracy and reduce complexity for providers and patients. Because the new Risk-Based Management Guidelines will be electronic, updates and new technologies will be incorporated at a much faster rate than in previous iterations of guidelines.
Target Audience
This educational activity is designed for pathologists, cytopathologists, cytotechnologists, students and other members of the cytopathology community.
Learning Objectives
- Understand the rationale behind using "risk" for management of abnormal cervical cancer screen results.
- Understand the 2020 changes and updates to clinical management of abnormal cervical cancer screen results.
- Understand implications of the 2020 ASCCP management guidelines for laboratories and pathologists.
Professor and Vice Chair of Pathology
Director of Cytopathology
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois
Professor of Clinical Pathology
UCSF Mt. Zion Medical Center
San Francisco, California
The presenters have no conflicts of interest or financial relationships to disclose.
Continuing Medical Education (CME) Statement
The American Society of Cytopathology is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The American Society of Cytopathology designates this enduring educational activity for a maximum of 2.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
American Board of Pathology Maintenance of Certification (CC)
This product can help fulfill the CME requirements and Self-Assessment Modules (SAMs) mandated by the American Board of Pathology Continuing Certification (CC) process. Earn up to 2.0 SAM Credit Hours.
Continuing Medical Laboratory Education (CMLE)
The ASC designates this activity for a maximum of 2.0 Continuing Medical Laboratory Education (CMLE) credit hours for non-physicians. The CMLE credit hours meet the continuing education requirements for the ASCP Board of Registry Certification Maintenance Program. Participants should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Cytotechnologists with Licenses in Florida and California
This program is approved for 2 continuing education credits in the State of Florida and 1 in the State of California. The credit on each link is good for three years from the live presentation date.
Available Credit
- 2.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™
- 1.00 California Credits
- 2.00 CMLE
- 2.00 Florida Credits
- 2.00 MOC II
- 2.00 Participant